criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview
criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview
Blog Article
However, in an effort to strike a balance between the rights of citizens as well as plans that are executed by the authorities with the welfare, financial progress and prosperity in the region, the Court didn't come up with a definitive ruling about the pending construction of the grid station, but, with the consent of both parties, ordered a review and report of grid project by the National Engineering Services of Pakistan (NESPAK) to recommend alterations and location alternatives.
fourteen. During the light in the position explained earlier mentioned, it's concluded that a civil servant provides a fundamental right to be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be considered for no fault of his possess and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the duration of service or within the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as set forth would not utilize, given that the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, rather he has been acquitted in the criminal charges based on evidence and it can be properly-settled regulation that once the civil servant is acquitted during the criminal case, then on this really charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment because of the department and held him disqualified with the post because acquittal for all upcoming purposes. The aforesaid proposition has been set at naught by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of the District Police Officer Mainwali and 2 others v.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal guidance or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed for the court in which the case has long been or will be filed.
Make use of the PACER Case Locator if you are not positive which specific federal court the case was filed. You might also conduct nationwide searches to determine whether or not a party is involved in a very federal case. This database updates at midnight daily.
Reasonable grounds can be found to the record to attach the petitioner with the commission in the alleged offence. However punishment with the alleged offence does not website tumble in the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. however uncovered Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising outside of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Section 489-F, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is within the credit in the petitioner as accused, therefore, case on the petitioner falls from the exception where bail cannot be granted even during the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, guidance continues to be sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion in the same is hereby reproduced:
96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually nicely-settled that though thinking about the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should consider the benefit of many of the qualified candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to such qualified candidates that are found to generally be most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked from the respondent department just to extend favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part of your respondent department.
Any court might look for to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to succeed in a different summary. The validity of this type of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to some higher court.
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, like eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature of the seized currency.
Please note, if you are seeking a rate exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Search for websites affiliated with reputable legal institutions or organizations. Confirm the information against other sources when attainable.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year aged boy from his home to protect him from the Terrible physical and sexual abuse he had experienced in his home, and also to prevent him from abusing other children within the home. The boy was placed within an crisis foster home, and was later shifted close to within the foster care system.